Donor-supported PLF (www.pacificlegal.org) is the leading watchdog organization that litigates, without charge, for limited government, property rights, individual rights, and a balanced approach to environmental regulations, in courts nationwide.
So many of PLF's cases are about trying to free Americans from onerous, unreasonable, and intrusive government control of even the most basic things. In this contest, we ask you to send us a line, preferably with a link, about a government regulation at the local, state, or federal level that goes too far or is enforced in an unreasonable or nonsensical way.
Mike and Chantell Sackett, of Priest Lake, Idaho, had their property rights "sacked" by the Environmental Protection Agency -- and we should soon know whether the U.S. Supreme Court will hear their lawsuit, in which they are represented by attorneys with PLF. The court is scheduled to consider the Sacketts' petition on Thursday, June 23, and announce whether it will take their case, on June 27.
PLF attorneys are assisting residents of Venice, who are plagued with people living in cars along neighborhood streets—and by the California Coastal Commission, which has blocked the community from taking steps to alleviate the problem. Listen to the victims: voices of the victims: Homeowners and other residents who have to put up with litter, sewage, and even crime on their very doorsteps.
At its August 12, 2010, public hearings, the California Coastal Commission considered a proposed update to Santa Barbara County's Local Coastal Program. At the hearing, PLF Attorney Dave Breemer spoke against the new rules. He reminded the Commission that the Coastal Act itself provides an exception from development permit requirements for agriculture.
The United States Fish and Wildlife Service decided to retain the kangaroo rat as an endangered species, concluding that there is insufficient protected habitat for the rat in Riverside and San Diego Counties to justify a delisting.Both PLF and the Farm Bureau will analyze the Service's finding closely to determine whether a follow-up lawsuit would be appropriate.
Represented by PLF attorneys, Matt Sissel has filed a federal lawsuit challenging the “individual mandate” in the new federal health care law. This is the provision that requires nearly all Americans — on pain of financial penalty — to buy health insurance, if they’re not covered through an employer.
For years, our supporters have asked if there’s some way they can help spread the word about our work to protect private property rights, free markets, a color-blind Constitution, and a sensible environmental policy. Now you can, thanks to PLF’s brand new on-line store.
Ruling in a lawsuit by Pacific Legal Foundation attorneys against San Francisco’s race- and sex-based quotas in public contracting, the state Supreme Court rejected the city’s contention that Proposition 209 violates the U.S. Constitution by allegedly targeting minority groups and limiting their ability to vindicate their rights.
Pacific Legal Foundation (PLF) represents concerned parents living in Rowland Unified School District, and one of the California Legislature’s leading champions of school choice, state Sen. Bob Huff (R-Diamond Bar), in arguing against an unreasonably restrictive interpretation of the state’s District of Choice law. The case is Rowland Unified School District v. Walnut Valley Unified School District, et. al.
PLF's amicus brief to the New Jersey Supreme Court argued that Edward and Nancy Klumpp should not be denied the right to seek just compensation for the taking of their property. The Court agreed with us, and held that, it is only fair to allow the Klumpps to seek compensation for the taking of their property now that it is clear that the property was, in fact, taken.